Pages

Showing posts with label print. Show all posts
Showing posts with label print. Show all posts

Thursday, April 15, 2010

27: what ever happened to inner beauty?

There are some days when I'm just in love with packaging and all the brilliant designers who are thoughtful about what they want to say and what they want people to think about. Passion + awareness + consideration + skill = staggering results. Truth!

Unfortunately, it appears that not all copy-writers, designers, and companies stop to consider the full repercussions of their messages. Many seem to take a concept (weight loss, or body mass index, as you're about to see) and hone in on it to the point that they get tunnel vision. All they can think is, "My message hits the spot exactly and completely," and as a result, they end up ignoring all the other ways people could interpret the same few words.

I think that this is what happened with General Mills' Multigrain Cheerios cereal box.

The intention of the packaging is to promote good health -- and there is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to live a healthy lifestyle -- but it does so in an extremely unsophisticated way.



Image from Multigrain Cheerios' corporate website

Two things that immediately stood out to me:

(1) There are a lot of SMALL THINGS you can do every day!
Notice the typography: Because of the weight and capitalization of the text, the phrase "small things" is what stands out to you. It's almost as though "small" should be your focus within that whole statement.

(2) The slogan "More grains, less you!" is a clever play on semantics. "Less you" refers to less of you physically. Less body fat, less "excess," less "glut," less you.

The phrasing is certainly clever, but it is also incredibly distasteful at the same time (not that "distasteful" automatically means "bad" -- sometimes we get a kick out of things that are distasteful. Sometimes companies do well with "distasteful"). But in this case... seeing as Multigrain Cheerios are a widespread commercial product, I'd say it would be in General Mills' best interest not to offend its market, no? Whether consciously done or not, the company is promoting the idea of body as identity. You = your fat. You = your body mass. Let's aim for less you!

As a woman, I understand the importance of having the ideal weight, the perfect shape, tiny arms and slim legs. I get it. I really do. In a world where, like it or not, we are bombarded with images of beautiful people, the rich and famous, stick-thin models, all the clichéd perceptions of beauty... how can we not want -- to some extent, at least -- the same for ourselves? We all want to be fawned over, complimented, admired for our physical appearance, the shapes of our bodies, our external features...

It's okay to want to be seen as beautiful. There's nothing wrong with that. But it can become an obsession, an extreme, and it turns into an issue when we look in the mirror and see "portion control," or "double chin," or -- heaven forbid -- "more grains, less you."

There are many, many, many, many people and campaigns out in the world, fighting against this type of self-identification, this idea of weight and BMI as an indication of allure and level of happiness. Unfortunately, Cheerios is one brand that does not seem to be doing much in the way of this.

Monday, December 21, 2009

21: wine labels at whole foods

My sister and I were shopping at Whole Foods last week when we stumbled upon their wine racks, which were filled with all sorts of lovely contemporary labels. Here are a few images for your viewing pleasure:



Look at the typography on this one... So snooty, I love it! And um, it's pink.



Words that come to mind: sxe, vegan, -xcore, tattoo. I imagine the customer of this product to be a dude with a beard and tattoo sleeves (featuring zombies, deer, owls, Frankenstein, etc.). And maybe an eyebrow piercing. (Oh... this is bad. Isn't it? This whole "me cataloguing/stereotyping the consumer of a product based on the appearance of a product" thing? But then again... Oh, let's just chalk it up to me being intensely shrewd and perceptive about market segmentation, ha!)



Many apologies in advance, but this label is more than somewhat tacky. Interesting, yes, but so tacky that it's sticking to my shoes...

There have been a lot of really clever packaging ideas popping up in the wine industry, so it's nice to at least see some of that creativity physically manifested...

Please also view: Toast-its, a collection of wine bottle "greeting cards." (via The Dieline)

Saturday, September 5, 2009

12: surface magazine

Blog. Oh, blog. How I long for the days of summer, when I could update every other day -- twice a day, even, if I was so inclined! Alas, attending class takes precedence, which leaves me with maybe-weekly updates. What I have for you today is Surface Magazine.










Surface Magazine, a really progressive-thinking print publication with an emphasis on style and design, comes out six times a year, and is a wonderful source for design inspiration.

One thing that immediately stood out to me the first time I saw the magazine was its distinctive text treatment. As a play on the idea of "surface," the magazine constantly "trims" the type a little bit (you can see what I mean in the first and third pictures I posted). It's not a design element I commonly see, but it's definitely dynamic -- keeps things interesting.

Also just wanted to point out the neat table of contents layout (fourth photo) -- I always pay attention to little structural and organizational elements, as I think it's the small details that really pull an entire magazine/layout together. Readers might not consciously notice whether or not the minor details (TOC, masthead and so forth) are consistent with the feature pages, but if they're totally divergent, you'll leave 'em with a weird taste in their mouths. People appreciate consistency, even if they don't recognize it.

One final thing to note: I'm kind of in love with the "unexpected" text in the second and last images, i.e. the "hotel" sign and the wall type. Very cool to see designers playing with typefaces and lettering in real-life, non-print applications.

See the rest (as well as an archive of previous magazine shots) on my Flickr (click), and be sure to check out Surface Magazine's website -- they feature a lot of really neat and beautiful, contemporary designs (click).

Saturday, August 29, 2009

11: posters from portland center stage

Just a short update, but since I plan on moving to Portland, Ore., someday, I thought I'd point out something pretty: new-ish poster designs from Portland Center Stage!


Designed by Kris Hargis


Designed by Andrew Holder


Designed by Lee Moyer

I love the first one ("The Chosen") for its cut + paste quality. It feels a bit folksy, and internalized, and dated, which of course, is perfect, given the subject of the poster. You can see more designs on their Flickr page (link) -- they're super nice, and very graphic-looking. Lots of brushes and interesting type... the Alfred Hitchcock one, especially, haha! Classic.

(via Portland Mercury)

Saturday, August 8, 2009

five: frame magazine










Lifted a couple shots from back issues of Frame Magazine, which is a really nice-looking trade magazine that focuses on interior and product design. I really love the innovative text styling, the graphic treatments and the way the pages are all laid out. Truly, it's a gorgeous magazine, and if you have an extra $24.95 lying about (I know, right?!), I'd recommend purchasing a copy! You can take a look at my Flickr for more photos (link).

Monday, August 3, 2009

two: trends in cover design

Did I miss the memo regarding the new trend in album covers or something? All set for release on Sept. 22, J. Tillman's Year in the Kingdom, The Hidden Cameras' Origin:Orphan and Hallelujah the Hills' Colonial Drones (personal fave) each happen to feature collage-style artwork on their covers.


J. Tillman


The Hidden Cameras


Hallelujah the Hills

What is the significance of this trend, and does it mean I can get a job designing jacket covers for indie/folk bands? (Dearest bands, it would be my pleasure... Please see my contact information in the column to the right.)

(via Pitchfork)